From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [RFC 2/7] linux-stubdomain: Compile Linux Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 11:45:38 +0100 Message-ID: <1431945938.4944.33.camel@citrix.com> References: <1423022775-7132-1-git-send-email-eshelton@pobox.com> <1423022775-7132-3-git-send-email-eshelton@pobox.com> <1431595717.13579.16.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: George Dunlap Cc: Anthony PERARD , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Stefano Stabellini , Eric Shelton List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, 2015-05-18 at 11:37 +0100, George Dunlap wrote: > So my unscientific poll (more details below) > > 1. Download tarball: 80MB, 111s (<2m) > > 2. git clone --depth 1: 138MiB, 392s. (~6m30s) > > I'd just go for the tarball, but I'll leave that decision up to you guys. TBH I don't think we should accept either of those in xen.git. The way to pursue Linux stubdomains further would seem to be via Raisin anyway. Ian.