From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/6] tools/libxl: Check if fdt_{first,
 next}_subnode are present in libfdt
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 12:03:20 +0100
Message-ID: <1432033400.12989.69.camel@citrix.com>
References: <1431542022-16138-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@citrix.com>
	<1431542022-16138-2-git-send-email-julien.grall@citrix.com>
	<555B12E2.70906@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>) id 1YufJc-0006sx-Tv
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 19 May 2015 11:04:05 +0000
In-Reply-To: <555B12E2.70906@citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@citrix.com>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, tim@xen.org, Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>, Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>, stefano.stabellini@citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 11:39 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 13/05/2015 19:33, Julien Grall wrote:
> > +#ifndef LIBXL_LIBFDT_COMPAT_H
> > +#define LIBXL_LIBFDT_COMPAT_H
> > +
> > +#if !HAVE_DECL_FDT_FIRST_SUBNODE
> > +int fdt_first_subnode(const void *fdt, int offset);
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +#if !HAVE_DECL_FDT_NEXT_SUBNODE
> > +int fdt_next_subnode(const void *fdt, int offset);
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +#endif
> 
> I've just noticed that I forgot to hide the 2 new functions as suggested 
> by Ian.
> 
> I can resend this series or send a follow-up.

Perhaps just send an update of this one patch?

> 
> Regards,
>