From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49]:35639 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751876AbbETIez (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 May 2015 04:34:55 -0400 Message-ID: <1432110893.2174.3.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20150520_103457_283448_8B556FB1) Subject: Re: [PATCH] backport: allow compilation with Ubuntu's 3.13 From: Johannes Berg To: "Grumbach, Emmanuel" Cc: "backports@vger.kernel.org" Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 10:34:53 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1432110664.5612.6.camel@intel.com> References: <1432042936-23733-1-git-send-email-emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> (sfid-20150519_154230_230935_983C6CAB) <1432110463.2174.2.camel@sipsolutions.net> <1432110664.5612.6.camel@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: backports-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 08:31 +0000, Grumbach, Emmanuel wrote: > On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 10:27 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 16:42 +0300, Emmanuel Grumbach wrote: > > > > > +#if (LINUX_VERSION_CODE == KERNEL_VERSION(3,13,11) && UTS_UBUNTU_RELEASE_ABI < 24) > > > > Now that I look at this again, I'm confused - shouldn't this whole thing > > have a ! in front? > > > > why? > I need this definition only for Ubuntu releases that are below 24. > Canonical ported that starting 24. > What am I missing? But every mainline kernel, say 3.10, also needs it. Also Ubuntu with 3.10, for example. johannes