From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/6] tools/libxl: Check if fdt_{first,
 next}_subnode are present in libfdt
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 15:13:19 +0100
Message-ID: <1432217599.10746.36.camel@citrix.com>
References: <1431542022-16138-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@citrix.com>
	<1431542022-16138-2-git-send-email-julien.grall@citrix.com>
	<555C8524.6010403@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>) id 1YvREP-00016N-OV
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 21 May 2015 14:13:53 +0000
In-Reply-To: <555C8524.6010403@citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@citrix.com>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, tim@xen.org, Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>, Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>, stefano.stabellini@citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 13:59 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> [...]
> From d4f0ea84f26649b61bc6afb550348069b71d41c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 17:58:14 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] tools/libxl: Check if fdt_{first,next}_subnode are present in
>  libfdt
> 
> The functions fdt_{first,next}_subnode may not be available because:
>     * It has been introduced in 2013 => Doesn't work on Wheezy
>     * The prototype exists but the functions are not exposed. Don't ask
>     why...
> 
> The later has been fixed recently in the dtc repo [1]

But the bug is still present in 1.4.0, right? Hence this patch is not
obsolete even given the next one.