From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH] libxl: fix "xl mem-set" regression from 0c029c4da2 Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 15:51:46 +0100 Message-ID: <1432219906.10746.55.camel@citrix.com> References: <5537A9E80200007800074B19@mail.emea.novell.com> <1429711278.30934.14.camel@citrix.com> <5537CF2A0200007800074C20@mail.emea.novell.com> <1429716987.30934.44.camel@citrix.com> <5537E9710200007800074DFD@mail.emea.novell.com> <1429725323.6174.25.camel@citrix.com> <555316DE0200007800079D60@mail.emea.novell.com> <1431524788.8263.278.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1YvSSK-0002Gv-DW for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 21 May 2015 15:32:20 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1431524788.8263.278.camel@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: Wei Liu , Ian Jackson , xen-devel , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 14:46 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > So what's the situation with this patch? Can it go in? Is someone > > working on a better fix for the described problem? > > Stefano, Are you? > > Regardless it seems to me that this patch is correct in its own right, > having maxmem_kb be a 64-bit type is the correct type for it to have. No one objected so I've now applied. Ian.