From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Osstest: stop testing SEDF,
 start testing RTDS
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 11:17:23 +0100
Message-ID: <1432289843.14664.0.camel@citrix.com>
References: <1432288527.7907.108.camel@citrix.com>
	<1432288953.10746.162.camel@citrix.com>
	<1432289604.3572.1.camel@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>) id 1Yvk1A-0007iJ-2Q
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 22 May 2015 10:17:28 +0000
In-Reply-To: <1432289604.3572.1.camel@citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 12:13 +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 11:02 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 11:55 +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > > the SEDF scheduler is about to be deprecated and go
> > > away (see [1]). OTOH, the RTDS scheduler is here to
> > > stay.
> > > 
> > > It therefore makes sense to stop smoke testing the
> > > former in favour of the latter. Note that the
> > > -sedf-pin jobs where only added in order to try to
> > > debug a long standing issue with SEDF; it is not
> > > necessary to have anything like that for RTDS.
> > 
> > Does the RTDS scheduler work out of the box? I had a feeling that it
> > required per domain config settings to be worked out?
> > 
> It does, your feeling is about ARINC653 :-)

Great, thanks!

Ian.