From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: ACPI shutdown unreliable with win7? Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 16:11:32 +0100 Message-ID: <1432912292.15036.64.camel@citrix.com> References: <1432284841.10746.136.camel@citrix.com> <555EEFD8.8020306@citrix.com> <1432285699.10746.147.camel@citrix.com> <1432904091.15036.27.camel@citrix.com> <55688018020000780007F06C@mail.emea.novell.com> <1432905214.15036.31.camel@citrix.com> <9AAE0902D5BC7E449B7C8E4E778ABCD02591CA56@AMSPEX01CL01.citrite.net> <1432910144.15036.53.camel@citrix.com> <9AAE0902D5BC7E449B7C8E4E778ABCD02591CD3C@AMSPEX01CL01.citrite.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <9AAE0902D5BC7E449B7C8E4E778ABCD02591CD3C@AMSPEX01CL01.citrite.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Paul Durrant Cc: Andrew Cooper , xen-devel , Jan Beulich , Ian Jackson List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 16:06 +0100, Paul Durrant wrote: > > FWIW We appear to wait 200s, if we were seeing failures due to windows > > update then I'd be inclined to extend that, but I think right now that > > would be premature, unless WU happens with no status on the screen. > > > > No, you'd see something. Perhaps our ACPI lid/power switch code is just buggy then? It seems to work reliably for the WinXP tests, FWIW... Ian.