From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 for Xen 4.6 0/4] Enabling XL to set
 per-VCPU parameters of a domain for RTDS scheduler
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 09:57:26 +0100
Message-ID: <1433149046.15036.80.camel@citrix.com>
References: <CAGHO-iqn3-3KGuo8JgN1EhK=BNt+MnkbzG7FFWTzeUTgh89d-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<1432630782.14664.60.camel@citrix.com>
	<1432898136.5077.13.camel@citrix.com>
	<CAENZ-+mf8tv7cDuhaHN6SesK-FkwTnQM3zC1VFVwFDQkewvqsg@mail.gmail.com>
	<556C1994.4090101@eu.citrix.com> <1433148506.15036.78.camel@citrix.com>
	<556C1CC8.10301@eu.citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <556C1CC8.10301@eu.citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>, xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>, Meng Xu <xumengpanda@gmail.com>, Meng Xu <mengxu@cis.upenn.edu>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>, Chong Li <lichong659@gmail.com>, Dagaen Golomb <dgolomb@seas.upenn.edu>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 09:50 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 06/01/2015 09:48 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 09:36 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
> >> ---
> >> CC: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
> >> CC: Wei Liu <wei.liu@citrix.com>
> > 
> > Most people put the Cc about the cut (---) which is fine too. It means
> > the history ends up recording who was copied on the patch, which isn't
> > necessarily a bad thing.
> 
> Right -- I would have thought that was useless information cluttering up
> the history, but I can see how it might actually be useful.  Should I
> start putting my CC's above the ---? :-)

FWIW, pretty much everyone else does.

Ian.