Patch "ext4: check for zero length extent explicitly" has been added to the 3.10-stable tree

[<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    ext4: check for zero length extent explicitly

to the 3.10-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     ext4-check-for-zero-length-extent-explicitly.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.10 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From 2f974865ffdfe7b9f46a9940836c8b167342563d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 19:00:45 -0400
Subject: ext4: check for zero length extent explicitly

From: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>

commit 2f974865ffdfe7b9f46a9940836c8b167342563d upstream.

The following commit introduced a bug when checking for zero length extent

5946d08 ext4: check for overlapping extents in ext4_valid_extent_entries()

Zero length extent could pass the check if lblock is zero.

Adding the explicit check for zero length back.

Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/ext4/extents.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ static int ext4_valid_extent(struct inod
 	ext4_lblk_t lblock = le32_to_cpu(ext->ee_block);
 	ext4_lblk_t last = lblock + len - 1;
 
-	if (lblock > last)
+	if (len == 0 || lblock > last)
 		return 0;
 	return ext4_data_block_valid(EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb), block, len);
 }


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from guaneryu@gmail.com are

queue-3.10/ext4-check-for-zero-length-extent-explicitly.patch