From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: RFC: QEMU bumping memory limit and domain restore
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 10:26:24 +0100
Message-ID: <1433409984.7108.90.camel@citrix.com>
References: <20150602140507.GM19403@zion.uk.xensource.com>
	<CAFLBxZbfv-DNV+yiqFNyd3myK8Yy3SYNbQJO_AzdjyEag1z-wg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150604091411.GF12468@zion.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <prvs=5906d0598=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>)
	id 1Z0RQ2-0007HO-QU
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 09:26:34 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20150604091411.GF12468@zion.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>, Don Slutz <dslutz@verizon.com>, andrew@zion.uk.xensource.com, xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>, Yang Hongyang <yanghy@cn.fujitsu.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Thu, 2015-06-04 at 10:14 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> The main objection is that we shouldn't call xc_domain_setmaxmem in the
> middle of a migration stream.

In the middle of an _xc_ migration stream.

This seems like the sort of thing it would be OK to have in a (to be
introduced) libxl stream (which would itself contain the xc stream as a
data item).

I think we are expecting such a thing to be introduced as part of the
libxl side of migration v2, aren't we?

Ian.