From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [xen-unstable test] 57852: regressions - FAIL Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 17:46:12 +0100 Message-ID: <1433522772.7108.364.camel@citrix.com> References: <1433493915.7108.138.camel@citrix.com> <5571814C02000078000812F1@mail.emea.novell.com> <1433495266.7108.145.camel@citrix.com> <5571858C020000780008132E@mail.emea.novell.com> <1433501300.7108.208.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0ul8-0000eX-AJ for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 16:46:18 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1433501300.7108.208.camel@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: Andrew Cooper , ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 11:48 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > All the flights in the new colo seem to have been on fiano[01]. > > But having looked at the page again the early success was all on fiano0 > while the later failures were all on fiano1. > > fiano[01] are supposedly identical hardware. > > This might be simply explained by osstest's stickiness for jobs on hosts > where they are failing. I'll run a few adhoc jobs on fiano0 using 57852 > as a template so we can see if that's the case. http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/57940/ http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/57945/ http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/57953/ All ran in fiano0 and passed the install phase (they failed shutdown, but that's a different story). They were using the exact same binaries every time, the ones from flight 57852 which failed on fiano1. So we may have a host specific issue on just 1 or a pair of hosts, which is certainly annoying! I'm going to run 3 on fiano1 to confirm that it still fails there. Then I'm going to run 3 more on each to make extra sure... Ian.