From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [xen-unstable test] 57852: regressions - FAIL Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 11:10:13 +0100 Message-ID: <1433758213.7108.424.camel@citrix.com> References: <1433493915.7108.138.camel@citrix.com> <5571814C02000078000812F1@mail.emea.novell.com> <1433495266.7108.145.camel@citrix.com> <5571858C020000780008132E@mail.emea.novell.com> <1433501300.7108.208.camel@citrix.com> <557569610200007800081D4C@mail.emea.novell.com> <1433753590.7108.392.camel@citrix.com> <557579500200007800081DF0@mail.emea.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Z1u16-0002F5-7r for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2015 10:10:52 +0000 In-Reply-To: <557579500200007800081DF0@mail.emea.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: Andrew Cooper , ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 10:15 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > (I'm trying to make myself a picture of what debugging options we > have.) In the meantime I've kicked off an adhoc job using no-apicv as suggested by Andy (on IIRC last week IIRC). Assuming that my tweak takes effect in practice I'll run a bunch of those to hopefully come up with a significant result. Ian.