From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH] make do_sched_op_compat() x86-specific Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 15:29:12 +0100 Message-ID: <1433773752.7108.511.camel@citrix.com> References: <5575B4A4020000780008222D@mail.emea.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Z1y3A-0006u3-Vt for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2015 14:29:17 +0000 In-Reply-To: <5575B4A4020000780008222D@mail.emea.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: xen-devel , Tim Deegan , Keir Fraser , Ian Jackson , Andrew Cooper List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 14:28 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > Being a pre-3.1 compatibility hypercall handler only, it's not needed > on ARM or any future architectures Xen may get ported to. > > Also the function shouldn't really be used internally - its use should > be limited to its purpose (and hence there's also no need for a > prototype). > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Since it vaguely has something to do with arm: Acked-by: Ian Campbell Was this the only such hypercall you found?