From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [xen-unstable test] 57852: regressions - FAIL
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 12:01:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1433934087.30003.32.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <557821330200007800082F1C@mail.emea.novell.com>
On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 10:36 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Indeed. Leaving us with the slight hope that there is a microcode
> update available that's newer than what the BIOS of those boxes
> loads. Could we perhaps afford un-blessing the two systems for
> the time being? And maybe get Intel involved if there's no ucode
> update available that helps?
Arranging to do microcode updates looks like it is going to be a bit
non-trivial from the osstest side. Is there any reason to think it would
help other than just hoping it will?
Can't we get Intel involved right away?
Ian.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-10 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-04 12:01 [xen-unstable test] 57852: regressions - FAIL osstest service user
2015-06-05 8:45 ` Ian Campbell
2015-06-05 9:00 ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-05 9:07 ` Ian Campbell
2015-06-05 9:18 ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-05 10:48 ` Ian Campbell
2015-06-05 16:46 ` Ian Campbell
2015-06-08 8:07 ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-08 8:53 ` Ian Campbell
2015-06-08 9:15 ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-08 9:27 ` Ian Campbell
2015-06-08 10:17 ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-08 14:43 ` Ian Jackson
2015-06-08 12:16 ` Ian Campbell
2015-06-08 12:19 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-06-08 12:24 ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-09 8:26 ` Ian Campbell
2015-06-09 9:29 ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-10 8:50 ` Ian Campbell
2015-06-10 9:36 ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-10 11:01 ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2015-06-10 11:48 ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-10 12:56 ` Ian Campbell
2015-06-10 13:23 ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-10 13:45 ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-10 14:08 ` Ian Campbell
2015-06-11 7:02 ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-11 8:45 ` Ian Campbell
2015-06-15 8:57 ` Ian Campbell
2015-06-15 9:03 ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-10 14:34 ` Ian Campbell
2015-06-10 15:59 ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-10 16:18 ` Don Slutz
2015-06-10 18:00 ` Ian Campbell
2015-06-08 13:50 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-06-08 14:02 ` Ian Campbell
2015-06-08 14:47 ` Ian Jackson
2015-06-08 15:21 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-06-08 15:29 ` Ian Campbell
2015-06-08 10:10 ` Ian Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1433934087.30003.32.camel@citrix.com \
--to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.