From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH OSSTEST v3] Stubdom test case Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 12:31:58 +0100 Message-ID: <1433935918.30003.56.camel@citrix.com> References: <1433932900-32440-1-git-send-email-wei.liu2@citrix.com> <21880.6961.473278.621239@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <21880.6961.473278.621239@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Jackson Cc: Wei Liu , xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 12:10 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > for xsm in $xsms ; do > > - do_hvm_debian_test_one debianhvm rombios $xsm > > + for stubdom in true "" ; do > > + do_hvm_debian_test_one debianhvm rombios $xsm $stubdom > > + done > > My understanding is that we are intending to do away with most of the > non-xsm tests. Ian, do you agree ? Not sure about in general, but for something like stubdoms it does seem plausible to only test XSM. If it works under XSM it seems unlikely that it would fail without. > In which case we should be creating just the two xsm jobs. > > Ian.