From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 19/19] bna: use netdev_* and dev_* instead of printk and pr_* Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 09:36:08 -0700 Message-ID: <1434040568.2972.8.camel@perches.com> References: <1433954605-22813-1-git-send-email-ivecera@redhat.com> <1433954605-22813-20-git-send-email-ivecera@redhat.com> <1433968190.32331.32.camel@perches.com> <5579582C.1050400@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, rasesh.mody@qlogic.com To: Ivan Vecera Return-path: Received: from smtprelay0205.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.205]:44622 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752236AbbFKQgL (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2015 12:36:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5579582C.1050400@redhat.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 11:43 +0200, Ivan Vecera wrote: > On 06/10/2015 10:29 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 18:43 +0200, Ivan Vecera wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera > > > > There should be some indication a few messages have > > been deleted in the commit log and a reason why too. > > > >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/brocade/bna/bnad.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/brocade/bna/bnad.c > > [] > >> @@ -965,10 +964,6 @@ bnad_cb_ethport_link_status(struct bnad *bnad, > >> /* > >> * Force an immediate > >> * Transmit Schedule */ > >> - printk(KERN_INFO "bna: %s %d " > >> - "TXQ_STARTED\n", > >> - bnad->netdev->name, > >> - txq_id); > > > > [] > > > >> @@ -1057,8 +1051,6 @@ bnad_cb_tx_stall(struct bnad *bnad, struct bna_tx *tx) > >> txq_id = tcb->id; > >> clear_bit(BNAD_TXQ_TX_STARTED, &tcb->flags); > >> netif_stop_subqueue(bnad->netdev, txq_id); > >> - printk(KERN_INFO "bna: %s %d TXQ_STOPPED\n", > >> - bnad->netdev->name, txq_id); > > > > etc... > > > I'm sorry I have removed them as logging noise. IMHO it is not necessary > to log when .probe() and .remove() are called or when TxQ is started or > stopped. I don't disagree at all, but it should be mentioned in the commit message.