From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Josh Durgin Subject: Re: rbd and the next firefly release Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 19:16:56 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <1434104180.13097157.1425169016883.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> References: <54F24F94.2020402@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx4-phx2.redhat.com ([209.132.183.25]:45235 "EHLO mx4-phx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751937AbbCAASA (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Feb 2015 19:18:00 -0500 In-Reply-To: <54F24F94.2020402@dachary.org> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Loic Dachary Cc: Ceph Development ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Loic Dachary" > To: "Josh Durgin" > Cc: "Ceph Development" > Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 3:30:28 PM > Subject: rbd and the next firefly release > > Hi Josh, > > The rbd teuthology suite for the next firefly release as found in > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commits/firefly-backports is green. The details > of the run is at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10641#rbd. Note that today's > run were to repeat the jobs that failed because of environmental problems > (i.e. problems that were fixed by fixing the test suite itself, not by > adding a patch to Ceph). Do you think it is ready for QE to start their own > round of testing ? Looks ready to me! Josh