From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/8] xenalyze: increase NR_CPUS to 256
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 09:33:55 +0100
Message-ID: <1434443635.13744.47.camel@citrix.com>
References: <1433849019-27452-1-git-send-email-olaf@aepfle.de>
	<1433849019-27452-3-git-send-email-olaf@aepfle.de>
	<55789E1C.9030504@citrix.com> <20150611061226.GA22268@aepfle.de>
	<55796B1C.9020309@citrix.com> <55799CBA.3020005@eu.citrix.com>
	<20150615161451.GA29475@aepfle.de> <557F0919.6020909@citrix.com>
	<20150615175828.GA11759@aepfle.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150615175828.GA11759@aepfle.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Julien Grall <julien.grall@citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Mon, 2015-06-15 at 19:58 +0200, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> 
> > In an ideal world, userspace tools like this should not really be tied
> > to NR_CPUS or MAX_CPUS.  They should get max_cpu_id from Xen and
> > dynamically allocate a bitmap of sufficient size.
> 
> The dumps are taken on one machine and get inspected on another, which
> may not even be a dom0. I like the idea with dynamically allocate the
> array size, based on a cmdline option. Once I find the time I will
> implement it.

Perhaps we should split out "get xenalyze in tree" out from actual
improvements and development work? The former ought to be pretty easy to
achieve, no?

Ian.