From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 14/25] reporting: sg-report-flight should ignore missing jobs Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 09:46:37 +0100 Message-ID: <1434617197.28264.17.camel@citrix.com> References: <1434559521-8751-1-git-send-email-ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> <1434559521-8751-15-git-send-email-ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Z5VT8-0002sg-CF for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 08:46:42 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1434559521-8751-15-git-send-email-ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Jackson Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, 2015-06-17 at 17:45 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > The function findaflight should not, when the caller specifies a job, > find a flight which does not contain that job at all. > > One effect of allowing it to find such flights is that it might find a > bisection flight and try to use it as a basis for claiming a > regression, or as a justification for something not being a > regression, and then complain that all the missing steps in the > bisection flight are `blocked'. > > This can be seen in the report for 58627: > test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 6 xen-boot fail blocked in 56366-bisect > > After this patch, a report generated for 58627 no longer mentions > 56366 at all. > > Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson Acked-by: Ian Campbell