From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: stable trees (was: [xen-4.2-testing test] 58584: regressions) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 15:22:33 +0100 Message-ID: <1434637353.28264.37.camel@citrix.com> References: <558151930200007800085E5C@mail.emea.novell.com> <21889.19282.1828.571256@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <5582C989020000780008696A@mail.emea.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Z5bSm-0006HI-AE for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 15:10:44 +0000 In-Reply-To: <5582C989020000780008696A@mail.emea.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: Lars Kurth , Ian Jackson , xen-devel , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, 2015-06-18 at 12:37 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 17.06.15 at 12:26, wrote: > > Jan Beulich writes ("stable trees (was: [xen-4.2-testing test] 58584: > > regressions)"): > >> Which leaves several options: > >> - the problem was always there, but hidden by some factor in the > >> old osstest instance, > > > > I think this is most likely. The old system had much older hosts. > > > > I think this is a race that we now happen to lose most of the time. > > For verification purposes, would it be possible to set up a couple of > flights on the old instance for one of the stable trees? I can try and run something adhoc on the old system if you can let me know exactly which jobs (test-*-*-*) and branches you are interested in. Ian. > >> One aspect making me indeed consider the build (or less likely > >> runtime) aspect is that we're seeing the frequent migration failures > >> in the stable trees only - other than unstable they're all getting built > >> with debug=n. > > > > Races frequently come and go with that kind of change. > > True. Question then still is who will try to look into the issue (as > right now it is quite harmful to the progress the stable trees can > make towards getting pushed). > > Jan > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel