From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Liam Girdwood Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Intel Kconfig: add SND_SOC_INTEL_BOARDS option Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 09:58:56 +0100 Message-ID: <1434704336.19885.8.camel@loki> References: <1434657579-21581-1-git-send-email-michele.curti@gmail.com> <20150619080806.GJ28601@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A8A1260545 for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 10:59:06 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20150619080806.GJ28601@localhost> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Vinod Koul Cc: Michele Curti , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, tiwai@suse.de, lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Fri, 2015-06-19 at 13:38 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 09:59:39PM +0200, Michele Curti wrote: > > Machine drivers under boards folder must be available for both > > SND_SST_MFLD_PLATFORM and SND_SOC_INTEL_SST. This patch adds a > > new kernel option SND_SOC_INTEL_BOARD to permit this. > > I dont think we need another config option, we should rather use SND_SOC :) > > Also Liam, do we need a prompt for SND_SOC_INTEL_SST, i am thinking of > removing that one and have it selected by respective machine drivers? Yeah, lets simplify our Kconfig now that we have cleaned up the intel directory. Liam