From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: stable trees (was: [xen-4.2-testing test] 58584: regressions) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 12:07:29 +0100 Message-ID: <1434712049.28264.100.camel@citrix.com> References: <558151930200007800085E5C@mail.emea.novell.com> <21889.19282.1828.571256@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <5582C989020000780008696A@mail.emea.novell.com> <1434637353.28264.37.camel@citrix.com> <5584024B0200007800086F10@mail.emea.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Z5u90-0005Gs-Du for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 11:07:34 +0000 In-Reply-To: <5584024B0200007800086F10@mail.emea.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: Lars Kurth , Ian Jackson , xen-devel , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, 2015-06-19 at 10:51 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 18.06.15 at 16:22, wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-06-18 at 12:37 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> >>> On 17.06.15 at 12:26, wrote: > >> > Jan Beulich writes ("stable trees (was: [xen-4.2-testing test] 58584: > >> > regressions)"): > >> >> Which leaves several options: > >> >> - the problem was always there, but hidden by some factor in the > >> >> old osstest instance, > >> > > >> > I think this is most likely. The old system had much older hosts. > >> > > >> > I think this is a race that we now happen to lose most of the time. > >> > >> For verification purposes, would it be possible to set up a couple of > >> flights on the old instance for one of the stable trees? > > > > I can try and run something adhoc on the old system if you can let me > > know exactly which jobs (test-*-*-*) and branches you are interested in. > > Any or all of test-amd64-*-xl-qemuu-win* (not sure whether you > can specify wildcards), and I guess stable-4.5 (or staging-4.5) > would be the most natural branch choice. I think the tools can do wildcards, yes. I've kicked off a full adhoc xen-4.5-testing flight so I have a local template to copy the jobs from for some repeated runs with just the problem flights (it's just easier to do that than to invent a cut-down flight from scratch...). > > Thanks, Jan >