From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: long.wanglong@huawei.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "ring-buffer-benchmark: Fix the wrong sched_priority of producer" has been added to the 3.10-stable tree
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 12:30:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1434742212205231@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
ring-buffer-benchmark: Fix the wrong sched_priority of producer
to the 3.10-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
ring-buffer-benchmark-fix-the-wrong-sched_priority-of-producer.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.10 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 108029323910c5dd1ef8fa2d10da1ce5fbce6e12 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wang Long <long.wanglong@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 08:12:37 +0000
Subject: ring-buffer-benchmark: Fix the wrong sched_priority of producer
From: Wang Long <long.wanglong@huawei.com>
commit 108029323910c5dd1ef8fa2d10da1ce5fbce6e12 upstream.
The producer should be used producer_fifo as its sched_priority,
so correct it.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1433923957-67842-1-git-send-email-long.wanglong@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Wang Long <long.wanglong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
@@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ static int __init ring_buffer_benchmark_
if (producer_fifo >= 0) {
struct sched_param param = {
- .sched_priority = consumer_fifo
+ .sched_priority = producer_fifo
};
sched_setscheduler(producer, SCHED_FIFO, ¶m);
} else
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from long.wanglong@huawei.com are
queue-3.10/ring-buffer-benchmark-fix-the-wrong-sched_priority-of-producer.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
reply other threads:[~2015-06-19 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1434742212205231@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=long.wanglong@huawei.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.