From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [osstest test] 58828: regressions - trouble:
 blocked/broken/fail/pass
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 11:04:37 +0100
Message-ID: <1435053877.28264.193.camel@citrix.com>
References: <osstest-58828-mainreport@xen.org>
	<1435051007.28264.180.camel@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <1435051007.28264.180.camel@citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 10:16 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 02:18 +0000, osstest service user wrote:
> > flight 58828 osstest real [real]
> > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/58828/
> > 
> > Regressions :-(
> > 
> > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> > including tests which could not be run:
> >  build-armhf                   3 host-install(3)         broken REGR. vs. 58726
> >  build-armhf-xsm               3 host-install(3)         broken REGR. vs. 58726
> >  build-armhf-pvops             3 host-install(3)         broken REGR. vs. 58726
> 
> Copy kernel /home/tftp//osstest/debian-installer/armhf/2015-01-10-wheezy/backports.deb failed: No such file or directory at Osstest/Debian.pm line 884.
> 
> Looks like I probably botched something in one of:
> 5dd4c52291b6 mg-debian-installer-update: updates to better handle Jessie onwards.
> cdbe966bb86e More flexible handling of need-kernel-deb-$flavour host flag
> 
> I'll investigate.

So, the way I appear to have structured the backwards compatibility it
retains compatibility with the existing host props, but not with the
existing TftpDiVersion.

IOW mg-debian-installer-update-all should have been run while committing
"More flexible handling of need-kernel-deb-$flavour host flag", which I
seem to have forgotten to note anywhere -- although Ian J did do so in
response to v2.

I don't think handling compatibility with the layout of the existing
TftpDiVersion dir is going to be easy or worth it.

Ian.