From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH OSSTEST v3 11/22] ts-kernel-build: Additional kernel options for Mustang Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 12:05:10 +0100 Message-ID: <1435316710.32500.166.camel@citrix.com> References: <1435159944.28264.295.camel@citrix.com> <1435159961-22292-11-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1435159961-22292-11-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, 2015-06-24 at 16:32 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > Note: ARM testing currently uses a 3.16 based linux-arm-xen kernel > (compared to 3.14 currently used as the default). In order to support > Mustang something newer is needed, I've been testing 4.1 (next LTS > kernel), 3.18 (the intervening LTS kernel) might be sufficient but I > haven't tried it. We should plan to either update linux-arm-xen or the > default kernel version at some point before we get Mustang h/w. FTR 3.18 seemed to work when I tried it again today, not sure what was up the last time (there has been a point release since though). Maybe I was confused by the sparsemem thing, which is now also understood. Ian.