From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dario Faggioli Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] OSSTest: stop testing SEDF, start testing RTDS Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 13:11:43 +0200 Message-ID: <1435317103.25170.194.camel@citrix.com> References: <1435316331.25170.191.camel@citrix.com> <1435316892.32500.167.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7799382191232193138==" Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Z8RY8-0001nK-A8 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 11:12:00 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1435316892.32500.167.camel@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" , Meng Xu , Ian Jackson , Wei Liu List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============7799382191232193138== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-xH5YyRRjSMMxGpNfrwJa" --=-xH5YyRRjSMMxGpNfrwJa Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 12:08 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 12:58 +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > the SEDF scheduler is about to be deprecated and go > > away (see [1]). OTOH, the RTDS scheduler is here to > > stay. > >=20 > > It therefore makes sense to stop smoke testing the > > former in favour of the latter. Note that the > > -sedf-pin jobs where only added in order to try to > > debug a long standing issue with SEDF; it is not > > necessary to have anything like that for RTDS. > >=20 > > For now, as RTDS is still marked as experimental, > > test failures are allowed, as it is for SEDF. > >=20 > > Also, RTDS was introduced in Xen 4.5, so add the > > test only for the relevant brnaches. Similarly, > > SEDF is removed in Xen 4.6, so keep testing it in > > older branches. > >=20 > > [1] http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-05/msg02874.html >=20 > osstest needs an S-o-b too I'm afraid. >=20 Bah! How in h$%l did I manage to miss this!?! :-// Would this work, or should I resend: Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli In any case, really sorry for that! :-( > Otherwise LGTM, Acked-by: Ian Campbell >=20 Thanks. I removed your Ack because, for gating it properly on the Xen version, I ended up restructuring it quite fundamentally. Thanks for looking at it again. Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-xH5YyRRjSMMxGpNfrwJa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEABECAAYFAlWNM28ACgkQk4XaBE3IOsRYkQCfX+qYiNYtlmQr0i+2kazZLnxQ WHQAoII01otGbVtuOArkJM04QdoJo+bu =cW7r -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-xH5YyRRjSMMxGpNfrwJa-- --===============7799382191232193138== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel --===============7799382191232193138==--