Re: NUMA config handling bug on reuse of libxl domain config

[Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1501 bytes --]

On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 14:20 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [PATCH v4 00/35] libxl ao abort request (cancellation)"):
> > Ian Jackson writes ("[PATCH v4 00/35] libxl ao abort request (cancellation)"):
> > > This is v4 of my series to provide support for abandoning a
> > > long-running libxl operation.
> > 
> > I've pushed it here
> > 
> >   http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=people/iwj/xen.git;a=summary
> >   git://xenbits.xen.org/people/iwj/xen.git
> >      base.ao-abort.v4..wip.ao-abort.v4
> > 
> > (base.ao-abort is yesterday's staging).
> 
> One of the tests failed until I put a workaround in.
> 
I see...

> The test program:
>  - creates and populates a libxl_domain_config
>  - calls libxl_domain_create_new
>  - destroys the resulting domain with libxl_domain_destroy
>  - calls libxl_domain_create_new again with the same config
> 
> The result is:
> 
>  libxl: error: libxl_dom.c:343:libxl__build_pre: Can run NUMA placement
>  only if the domain does not have any NUMA node affinity set already
> 
>  libxl: error: libxl_create.c:1174:domcreate_rebuild_done: cannot
>  (re-)build domain: -6
> 
Ok, thanks for letting know. I will look into this ASAP.

Regards,
Dario

-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)

[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel