From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: Stop testing SEDF almost at all (at least until Xen 4.2) [was: Re: [PATCH v2] OSSTest: stop testing SEDF, start testing RTDS] Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 17:14:02 +0100 Message-ID: <1435335242.32500.206.camel@citrix.com> References: <1435316331.25170.191.camel@citrix.com> <21901.16190.81742.872136@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <1435326209.25170.220.camel@citrix.com> <21901.28322.907293.881746@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <1435334953.25170.230.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Z8WGY-0006Fx-8n for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 16:14:10 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1435334953.25170.230.camel@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Dario Faggioli Cc: George Dunlap , "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" , Meng Xu , Ian Jackson , Wei Liu List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 18:09 +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote: > Ok, I'm fine with this. Looking at make-flight, we seem to want to be > able to run tests on Xen 3.*, 4.0, 4.1. As I said in my email, I can't > speak for these. I honestly think that SEDF was already broken, so I > personally would be more than glad to send a patch that gets rid of it > all the way, but that does not count much, I guess, as I wasn't here! Given that we aren't (I think) planning on any more point releases to these it's very unlikely that osstest will ever actually test them again. Maybe 4.1 might get the occasional security fix, but strictly it is even past that phase. Ian.