From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 08/13] Reporting: Break out report_blessingscond Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 12:01:12 +0100 Message-ID: <1435662072.21469.96.camel@citrix.com> References: <1435598089-21647-1-git-send-email-ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> <1435598089-21647-9-git-send-email-ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> <1435655479.21469.36.camel@citrix.com> <21906.25056.514009.551103@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <1435657465.21469.51.camel@citrix.com> <21906.26439.856510.279474@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Z9tHx-0005Wn-L3 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 11:01:17 +0000 In-Reply-To: <21906.26439.856510.279474@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Jackson Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, 2015-06-30 at 10:54 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Perhaps having a central regexp for flight names would be a good > thing, yes, but I don't think it's relevant for this patch. Right yes, I was confusing blessings and flights when I first piped up, sorry. > I suggest > we cross that bridge next time we have to introduce another ad-hoc > check for a flight name. Ack.