From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dario Faggioli Subject: Re: Xen + futexes Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 12:48:51 +0200 Message-ID: <1435834131.25170.456.camel@citrix.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6956208053451671242==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Vitaly Chernooky Cc: xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============6956208053451671242== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ZEugdAfB+KyjzUDt+7rW" --=-ZEugdAfB+KyjzUDt+7rW Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 12:48 +0300, Vitaly Chernooky wrote: > Hi all! > Hi, >=20 > I have theoretical question. > Great, I love theoretical stuff! :-P >=20 > What do you think about porting futexes or binder to XEN? > Ouch... That's *too* theoretical! :-) No, really, I know a bit about futexes [0], while I know nothing about binder (I'll investigate). Actually, we don't even have mutexes _within_ the hypervisor, so I struggle a bit to figure out how it would be useful to offer a similar support to whatever is userspace for us (i.e., what futexes do, as far as I can recall). So, that's why I was joking/saying about this being too much theoretical: do you have a use case in mind where something like that can help and be useful? If yes, I'd be interested in hearing about it. Regards, Dario [0] http://www.akkadia.org/drepper/futex.pdf --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-ZEugdAfB+KyjzUDt+7rW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEABECAAYFAlWVFxQACgkQk4XaBE3IOsRu/gCeIiS22K3GLBKBUM0sAX1hAIm2 5O4AoIQ6nQEQfP5L1IzIXk2mrLcQgr5O =4DYS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ZEugdAfB+KyjzUDt+7rW-- --===============6956208053451671242== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel --===============6956208053451671242==--