From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 07/18] xen/arm: ITS: implement hw_irq_controller for LPIs Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 13:35:06 +0100 Message-ID: <1435840506.21469.337.camel@citrix.com> References: <1434974517-12136-1-git-send-email-vijay.kilari@gmail.com> <1434974517-12136-8-git-send-email-vijay.kilari@gmail.com> <55896DEC.2030101@citrix.com> <1435579158.32500.288.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Vijay Kilari Cc: Stefano Stabellini , Prasun Kapoor , Vijaya Kumar K , Tim Deegan , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" , Julien Grall , Stefano Stabellini , manish.jaggi@caviumnetworks.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 17:51 +0530, Vijay Kilari wrote: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 15:32 +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > > [...] > >> > +{ > >> > + struct its_collection *col; > >> > + struct its_device *its_dev = get_irq_device(desc); > >> > + u8 *cfg; > >> > + u32 virq = irq_to_virq(desc); > >> > + > >> > + ASSERT(virq < its_dev->nr_lpis); > >> > + > >> > + cfg = gic_rdists->prop_page + desc->irq - NR_GIC_LPI; > >> > + if ( enable ) > >> > + *cfg |= LPI_PROP_ENABLED; > >> > + else > >> > + *cfg &= ~LPI_PROP_ENABLED; > >> > + > >> > + /* > >> > + * Make the above write visible to the redistributors. > >> > + * And yes, we're flushing exactly: One. Single. Byte. > >> > + * Humpf... > >> > + */ > >> > + if ( gic_rdists->flags & RDIST_FLAGS_PROPBASE_NEEDS_FLUSHING ) > >> > + clean_and_invalidate_dcache_va_range(cfg, sizeof(*cfg)); > >> > + else > >> > + dsb(ishst); > >> > + > >> > + /* Get collection id for this event id */ > >> > + col = &its_dev->its->collections[virq % num_online_cpus()]; > >> > >> This is fragile, you are assuming that num_online_cpus() will never > >> change. Why don't you store the collection in every irq_desc? > > > > The original Linux code upon which this is based doesn't seem to need to > > lookup the collection here, why is flushing needed for us but not Linux? > > We are writing to lpi property table. Even linux code flushes it. Sorry I was referring to the collection look up and inv, not the cache flush, i.e. this bit: + /* Get collection id for this event id */ + col = &its_dev->its->collections[virq % num_online_cpus()]; + its_send_inv(its_dev, col, virq); Linux doesn't seem to do that INV there. Ian.