Re: [linux-3.18 test] 59041: regressions - trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass

[Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>]

On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 11:16 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-3.18 test] 59041: regressions - trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass"):
> > On Fri, 2015-07-03 at 22:21 +0000, osstest service owner wrote:
> > 
> > >  build-armhf-xsm               4 host-build-prep           fail REGR. vs. 58581
> > 
> > A strange one I think.
> 
> resource host arndale-metrocentre shared build-wheezy-armhf
> 3c464fbf8a05b24f4afb7e58bcf4ae77fbb7ad0c not build-wheezy-armhf
> 8600096139e58a283eb2c23c769673d451487e1c at Osstest/Executive.pm line
> 840.
> 
> This is a safety catch - effectively, an assertion failure.  It is
> trying to mark arndale-metrocentre suitable for other jobs to use,
> with a sharing key of
>   build-wheezy-armhf 8600096139e58a283eb2c23c769673d451487e1c
> 
> What it is asserting is that the host is currently in preparation,
> with the same sharing key.  But the host's sharing key was
>   build-wheezy-armhf 3c464fbf8a05b24f4afb7e58bcf4ae77fbb7ad0c
> 
> The hash is the osstest revision.  This is the result of me updating
> the osstest revision under its feet.

I somehow managed to miss that those massive numbers making up 2/3 of
the log message were different...

> Nice to see in
>   http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/build-armhf-xsm/linux-3.18
> that my display of multiple osstest revisions works :-).

Yes indeed!

Ian.