From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
To: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] libxl: get rid of the SEDF scheduler
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 18:17:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1436199470.10763.11.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <559AA178.5030600@eu.citrix.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3130 bytes --]
On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 16:40 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 07/06/2015 04:30 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > only the interface is left in place, for backward
> > compile-time compatibility, but every attempt to
> > use it would throw an error.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
> > Reviewed-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
>
> This probably should have been dropped...
>
> > Chenges from v2:
> > - introduce and use ERROR_FEATURE_REMOVED, as requested
> > during review;
> > - mark the SEDF only parameter as deprecated in libxl_types.idl,
> > as requested during review.
>
> ...given these. One question:
>
Really? I'm basically only adding commentary, not changing (or adding,
or removing) a single line of code... I mean, the deprecation was
de-facto there already, since v1, it just was not stated explicitly
anywhere in that particular file.
That's why I didn't think a something like adding this comment would
call for removal of the tag.
Anyway, sorry for this. :-)
> > @@ -356,9 +357,13 @@ libxl_domain_sched_params = Struct("domain_sched_params",[
> > ("weight", integer, {'init_val': 'LIBXL_DOMAIN_SCHED_PARAM_WEIGHT_DEFAULT'}),
> > ("cap", integer, {'init_val': 'LIBXL_DOMAIN_SCHED_PARAM_CAP_DEFAULT'}),
> > ("period", integer, {'init_val': 'LIBXL_DOMAIN_SCHED_PARAM_PERIOD_DEFAULT'}),
> > - ("slice", integer, {'init_val': 'LIBXL_DOMAIN_SCHED_PARAM_SLICE_DEFAULT'}),
> > - ("latency", integer, {'init_val': 'LIBXL_DOMAIN_SCHED_PARAM_LATENCY_DEFAULT'}),
> > - ("extratime", integer, {'init_val': 'LIBXL_DOMAIN_SCHED_PARAM_EXTRATIME_DEFAULT'}),
> > + # The following three parameters ('slice', 'latency' and 'extratime') are deprecated,
> > + # and will have no effect if used, since the SEDF scheduler has been removed.
> > + # Note that 'period' was an SDF parameter too, but it is still effective as it is
> > + # now used (together with 'budget') by the RTDS scheduler.
> > + ("slice", integer, {'init_val': 'LIBXL_DOMAIN_SCHED_PARAM_SLICE_DEFAULT'}), # deprecated
> > + ("latency", integer, {'init_val': 'LIBXL_DOMAIN_SCHED_PARAM_LATENCY_DEFAULT'}), # deprecated
> > + ("extratime", integer, {'init_val': 'LIBXL_DOMAIN_SCHED_PARAM_EXTRATIME_DEFAULT'}), # deprecated
> > ("budget", integer, {'init_val': 'LIBXL_DOMAIN_SCHED_PARAM_BUDGET_DEFAULT'}),
>
> Since we're aiming for API compatibility rather than ABI compatibility,
> is it allowable to move 'budget' up above the comment, so that it's more
> obvious that it hasn't been deprecated?
>
It's tool's people call, I guess. My opinion is that, yes, it should be
possible without any issue, and yes, I also would like the end result
better.
Thanks and Regards,
Dario
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-06 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-06 15:30 [PATCH v3 0/7] get rid of the SEDF Dario Faggioli
2015-07-06 15:30 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] libxl: get rid of the SEDF scheduler Dario Faggioli
2015-07-06 15:40 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-06 16:17 ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
2015-07-06 16:22 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-06 16:26 ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-06 17:44 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-07-06 17:43 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-07-07 13:48 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-07 14:15 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-07 14:19 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-07 14:22 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-07 15:50 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-07-07 15:10 ` R: " Dario Faggioli
2015-07-06 15:30 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] tools: python: get rid of the SEDF scheduler bindings Dario Faggioli
2015-07-06 15:30 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] libxc: get rid of the SEDF scheduler Dario Faggioli
2015-07-06 15:31 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] xen: " Dario Faggioli
2015-07-06 15:31 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] xen: kill sched_sedf.c Dario Faggioli
2015-07-06 15:31 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] xl: get rid of the SEDF scheduler Dario Faggioli
2015-07-06 15:31 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] docs: " Dario Faggioli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1436199470.10763.11.camel@citrix.com \
--to=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.