From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH OSSTEST v7 12/15] Add testing of non-LVM/phy disk backends. Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 17:26:22 +0100 Message-ID: <1436199982.25646.135.camel@citrix.com> References: <1432734277.14664.229.camel@citrix.com> <1432734323-14128-12-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com> <21914.40166.659506.132067@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <1436197989.25646.124.camel@citrix.com> <21914.42610.77325.989735@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <21914.42610.77325.989735@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Jackson Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 17:01 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH OSSTEST v7 12/15] Add testing of non-LVM/phy disk backends."): > > On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 16:21 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > > Are some of these jobs not very similar to existing ones ? > > > > They differ in the backing store used for the guest's disks, but > > otherwise they are quite similar to the existing flight, except they are > > installed with d-i not xen-create-image. > > I meant the lvm ones. The list here was: for fmt in raw vhd qcow2 ; do i.e. no LVM. (as an implementation detail each of the above will in its own LVM LV, but that's not what I think you were getting at). > > > The use of d-i is simply because it was easier to reuse > > ts-debian-di-install than to convince xen-create-image to using non-LVM, > > rather than a particular desire to test d-i in this context. > > So we are add d-i pv storage-on-lvm tests here, as well as > storage-not-on-lvm tests. That's good. We aren't adding that, but we could if you wanted. Ian.