Re: [PATCH v2] Modified RTDS scheduler to use an event-driven model instead of polling.

[Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1015 bytes --]

On Sun, 2015-06-28 at 16:17 -0400, Dagaen Golomb wrote:
> It does take some thinking as to whether this will occur or not. I
> also am not sure
> if Xen will let the timer handlers preempt each other and, if so, if
> this is even a
> problem.
> 
I was about to tell you... But, really, if you want to try going there
and finding it yourself, I think it would be more useful, as you'll
learn something and you won't forget the answer after 5 minutes, as it
happens when someone just tells you something, without you knowing out
of own personal investigation, why that is the case. :-)

So, as you wish. If you just wanna know, as again. If you fancy go down
in the code and check, that, IMO, would be best. :-D

Thanks and Regards,
Dario
-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)

[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel