From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH] libxl: Increase device model startup timeout to 1min. Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 14:44:05 +0100 Message-ID: <1436276645.25646.203.camel@citrix.com> References: <1435336867.32500.209.camel@citrix.com> <20150629142317.GB1891@perard.uk.xensource.com> <1435589517.32500.342.camel@citrix.com> <20150629160919.GC1891@perard.uk.xensource.com> <21906.41470.414971.681618@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <21906.50807.907706.819950@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <20150702111148.GG1891@perard.uk.xensource.com> <21909.12493.239202.740226@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <20150703112150.GI1891@perard.uk.xensource.com> <21910.29254.453905.459416@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <21910.29254.453905.459416@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Jackson Cc: Anthony PERARD , xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Wei Liu , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, 2015-07-03 at 12:30 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > So papering over this with an increase in the timeout is probably > proper. Yes :-/ > I'm tempted to suggest increasing the timeout only on Linux. How tempted? Or shall I apply this patch? Ian.