From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <1436283224.3308.2.camel@redhat.com> From: Tim Waugh Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 16:33:44 +0100 In-Reply-To: <559B2849.7060907@gmail.com> References: <559B2849.7060907@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-uqX4HJiOkwU8B0CjXlJc" Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Printing-architecture] Upstream future of ippusbxd List-Id: Printing architecture under linux List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Till Kamppeter , Debian-printing@lists.debian.org, Open Printing --=-uqX4HJiOkwU8B0CjXlJc Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 22:15 -0300, Till Kamppeter wrote: > I am thinking about joining it into the cups-filters upstream package > to not have too many tiny packages to make up the complete printing > stack and cups-filters contains all manufacturer-independent software=20 > for communication with printers which is not part of CUPS itself. I don't really have a strong opinion either way. Having it in its own package would be fine for me, but if you want to put it in cups-filters I'd be OK with that too. What I would definitely prefer is to have it hosted in git not bzr. :-) Tim. */ --=-uqX4HJiOkwU8B0CjXlJc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAABAgAGBQJVm/FYAAoJELfCDQeUkepjrdIIAJDl7hyNBL07ielFRXYE1+wR rRuqxPvunz/L38U74pVimh8kHy1BxIj0wZL77AkHXtDucKfQ0sxIssurHTUNzg4W JbsrBu3aQEbj9lrlqDMm8MIjX3tWb59ZGbxilUAHLxZPVOojbllFSMyXZeo2TPPe iwfLuhKgIGAGpGHYLzrk4hRW0RB8cti1HRdi8eUbTiAWZ5anhX+qrBVttWw/wXPk J4/DG2UFbYIrplv7tL7Pa3QrlhfzX144dBc6Jc3+uV6Tx2TOoxCqzzVtY9MrrFXq 4JIZFpi0GBQSHYJ9uiRlQaGs2XB8K4QoofE/cVqr0nJ9HPpehRRkmtIZ2+zg6ow= =q4PD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-uqX4HJiOkwU8B0CjXlJc--