From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH OSSTEST v8 05/14] distros: Support pvgrub
	for Wheezy too.
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 15:55:44 +0100
Message-ID: <1436367344.23508.63.camel@citrix.com>
References: <1436358648.23508.32.camel@citrix.com>
	<1436358662-12886-5-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com>
	<21917.9822.881155.233365@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
	<1436363468.23508.43.camel@citrix.com>
	<21917.11391.22666.469551@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <21917.11391.22666.469551@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 14:58 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH OSSTEST v8 05/14] distros: Support pvgrub for Wheezy too."):
> > On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 14:32 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > Ian Campbell writes ("[PATCH OSSTEST v8 05/14] distros: Support pvgrub for Wheezy too."):
> > > > +\# $suite backports
> > > 
> > > What is that \ doing ?  (Here documents do not - in either Perl no
> > > shell - elide #-comments.)
> > > 
> > > Perhaps I have misunderstood.
> > 
> > Nope, that would be me I think.
> > 
> > I couldn't remember so I err'd on the side of caution intending to
> > check, but then resent before my test got as far as Wheezy.
> 
> OK, well, if you remove that,

Will do.

>  then
> 
> Acked-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>

Thanks. I think that makes all but the last patch acked.

The last one needs some more thought about the approach, as discussed on
v7, but perhaps this could go in without that one? The new additions to
the main xen flights should work without, it's just the debian-* flights
which will be run here in Cambridge which might suffer.

Ian.