From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH OSSTEST v1] ap-fetch-version: Arrange for osstest merges from upstream to be stable
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 10:54:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1436435688.23508.87.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1436369202.23508.68.camel@citrix.com>
On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 16:26 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 16:23 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Ian Campbell writes ("[PATCH OSSTEST v1] ap-fetch-version: Arrange for osstest merges from upstream to be stable"):
> > > If a downstream osstest instance has nothing to test it its local
> > > pretest then it will attempt to merge from the upstream instance. If
> > > this fails then it will try again and again generating a new merge
> > > commit each time, even if upstream has not moved.
> > >
> > > It is desirable that these merges instead be stable i.e. the same if
> > > the inputs have not changed. This is good for potential bisection
> > > attempts, history reporting/mining as well as just being sensible.
> > >
> > > Here we arrange for this by recording the last merge "epoch" (being
> > > the first merge of the current input branches) in a new branch
> > > "merge-epoch" in the local testing.git and comparing our fresh merge
> > > against it.
> > >
> > > If the tree and parents are the same then the merge is effectively
> > > identical (it may/will differ in the date) and we reuse the epoch
> > > merge.
> > >
> > > If they new merge does not match then something has changed (i.e.
> > > upstream has moved on) and so we take the new merge and establish a
> > > new epoch.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
> >
> > Acked-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
>
> Thanks. I've put this into the Cambridge instance's pretest, and will
> send a pull request to merge back the result when it has baked there.
This passed the Cambridge push gate but then turned out to be missing at
least one ">&2" on the git reset, which resulted in things leaking onto
stdout which should have been there and:
OSSTEST_REVISION='HEAD is now at 8f88bfa ap-fetch-version: Arrange for osstest merges from upstream to be stable
8f88bfa7ac682d4d0df7da206b239a062870c84c'
Needless to say things did not improve from there...
I've placed a stop file and am about to unwind the various things which
need unwinding and push a new version with >&2 added in the appropriate
places, including a couple of "git fetch" which seem to not need them in
practice (at least while things are operating normally), but for
robustness I added them.
Ian.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-09 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-03 9:40 [PATCH OSSTEST v1] ap-fetch-version: Arrange for osstest merges from upstream to be stable Ian Campbell
2015-07-08 15:23 ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-08 15:26 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-09 9:54 ` Ian Campbell [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1436435688.23508.87.camel@citrix.com \
--to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.