From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dario Faggioli Subject: Re: Fwd: [v3 14/15] Update Posted-Interrupts Descriptor during vCPU scheduling Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 17:20:10 +0200 Message-ID: <1436887210.13522.158.camel@citrix.com> References: <1435123109-10481-15-git-send-email-feng.wu@intel.com> <55918214.4030102@citrix.com> <1435633087.25170.274.camel@citrix.com> <1435825253.25170.406.camel@citrix.com> <559E6EB7.3050609@eu.citrix.com> <559E96E0020000780008ED84@mail.emea.novell.com> <1436451512.22672.333.camel@citrix.com> <559E84EF.7060507@eu.citrix.com> <559F80C6020000780008F348@mail.emea.novell.com> <1436526348.22672.387.camel@citrix.com> <55A53EC60200007800090D3E@mail.emea.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3700855925478174303==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <55A53EC60200007800090D3E@mail.emea.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: Kevin Tian , Feng Wu , George Dunlap , "andrew.cooper3@citrix.com" , xen-devel , Yang Z Zhang , "keir@xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============3700855925478174303== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-jknXwBOAkTqQqlBKucX3" --=-jknXwBOAkTqQqlBKucX3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2015-07-14 at 15:54 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 14.07.15 at 16:08, wrote: > > Thanks for the suggestion! I made a draft patch for this idea, It may h= ave > > some issues since It is just a draft version, kind of like prototype, I= post > > it here just like to know whether it is meet your expectation, if it is= I > > can continue with this direction and this may speed up the upstreaming > > process. Thanks a lot! >=20 > FWIW this looks okay to me as a draft (i.e. minus mechanical issues). > If it meets your requirements, I think this would nicely eliminate all th= e > objections against the earlier model. But let's see what Dario and > George think... >=20 I'll reply to the Feng's email in more detail (even considering that it's a draft), but yes, indeed, this looks *a lot* nicer, a way better way of interacting with the scheduler! The approach is exactly the one I had in mind and was asking Feng to investigate, and I like the result much better than the old runstate-based hack-ish model. :-) Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-jknXwBOAkTqQqlBKucX3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEABECAAYFAlWlKKoACgkQk4XaBE3IOsSLqACdFmrkOlcZqE9ZsI6gBKiNSg9n g3wAoKlTutXhz9XMVXV7GKBep5sKn1aC =I2G2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-jknXwBOAkTqQqlBKucX3-- --===============3700855925478174303== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel --===============3700855925478174303==--