From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [xen-unstable test] 59544: regressions - FAIL Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:16:07 +0100 Message-ID: <1436951767.11153.18.camel@citrix.com> References: <1436950602.13522.188.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1436950602.13522.188.camel@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Dario Faggioli Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, osstest service owner List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 10:56 +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 08:48 +0000, osstest service owner wrote: > > flight 59544 xen-unstable real [real] > > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/59544/ > > > > Regressions :-( > > > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > > including tests which could not be run: > > > > test-armhf-armhf-xl 6 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 58965 > > > To me, it looks like the box did actually reboot in Xen. However: > > Jul 14 21:04:52.969102 Starting NTP server: ntpd[ 76.734015] asix 2-3.2.4:1.0 eth0: link down > Jul 14 21:05:46.565053 [ 85.437886] asix 2-3.2.4:1.0 eth0: link down > Jul 14 21:05:55.269159 . > > Which is something I certainly I've seen already (I'm not sure it was on > arndale, but I think yes), and AFAICR, we can't do much about. Correct, the USB Ethernet device on these systems is flakey for one reason or another. Looking at the 4 http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/host/arndale-*.html it doesn't seem to happen very frequently (1/20 jobs perhaps). Ian.