From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH] make rangeset_report_ranges() report all ranges Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 14:43:33 +0100 Message-ID: <1436967813.32371.73.camel@citrix.com> References: <55A67702020000780009157E@mail.emea.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZFMyN-0007Nh-T8 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 13:43:44 +0000 In-Reply-To: <55A67702020000780009157E@mail.emea.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: xen-devel , Keir Fraser , Ian Jackson , Tim Deegan List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 14:06 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > find_range() returns NULL when s is below the lowest range, so we have > to use first_range() here (which is as good performance wise). The bug here was that the first range would be omitted under certain conditions? Saying which here would be interesting. > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Acked-by: Ian Campbell > > --- a/xen/common/rangeset.c > +++ b/xen/common/rangeset.c > @@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ int rangeset_report_ranges( > > read_lock(&r->lock); > > - for ( x = find_range(r, s); x && (x->s <= e) && !rc; x = next_range(r, x) ) > + for ( x = first_range(r); x && (x->s <= e) && !rc; x = next_range(r, x) ) > if ( x->e >= s ) > rc = cb(max(x->s, s), min(x->e, e), ctxt); > > > >