From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>,
Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysctl: adjust XEN_SYSCTL_cputopoinfo behavior
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 16:51:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1436975519.32371.122.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55A3FB110200007800090488@mail.emea.novell.com>
On Mon, 2015-07-13 at 16:53 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> The new function's implementation, other than the original one of
FWIW "other than the" would normally be expressed as "unlike the".
> XEN_SYSCTL_topologyinfo, didn't allow the caller to get what it needs
> (if e.g. it's after the data for just one specific CPU) with just one
> hypercall, without caring about the total number of CPUs in the system.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
>
> --- a/xen/common/sysctl.c
> +++ b/xen/common/sysctl.c
> @@ -358,15 +358,9 @@ long do_sysctl(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xe
> {
> xen_sysctl_cputopo_t cputopo = { 0 };
>
> - if ( ti->num_cpus < num_cpus )
> - {
> - ret = -ENOBUFS;
> - i = num_cpus;
> - }
> - else
> - i = 0;
> -
> - for ( ; i < num_cpus; i++ )
> + if ( num_cpus > ti->num_cpus )
> + num_cpus = ti->num_cpus;
> + for ( i = 0; i < num_cpus; ++i )
> {
> if ( cpu_present(i) )
> {
> @@ -393,7 +387,7 @@ long do_sysctl(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xe
> else
> i = num_cpus;
>
> - if ( (!ret || (ret == -ENOBUFS)) && (ti->num_cpus != i) )
> + if ( !ret && (ti->num_cpus != i) )
> {
> ti->num_cpus = i;
> if ( __copy_field_to_guest(u_sysctl, op,
> --- a/xen/include/public/sysctl.h
> +++ b/xen/include/public/sysctl.h
> @@ -482,10 +482,11 @@ DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(xen_sysctl_cputo
> * - otherwise it's the number of entries in 'cputopo'
> *
> * OUT:
> - * - If 'num_cpus' is less than the number Xen needs to write, -ENOBUFS shall
> - * be returned and 'num_cpus' updated to reflect the intended number.
> - * - On success, 'num_cpus' shall indicate the number of entries written, which
> - * may be less than the maximum.
> + * - If 'num_cpus' is less than the number Xen wants to write but the handle
> + * handle is not a NULL one, partial data gets returned and 'num_cpus' gets
> + * updated to reflect the intended number.
> + * - Otherwise, 'num_cpus' shall indicate the number of entries written, which
> + * may be less than the input value.
> */
> struct xen_sysctl_cputopoinfo {
> uint32_t num_cpus;
>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-15 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-13 15:53 [PATCH] sysctl: adjust XEN_SYSCTL_cputopoinfo behavior Jan Beulich
2015-07-13 17:43 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-14 9:41 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-15 15:51 ` Ian Campbell [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1436975519.32371.122.camel@citrix.com \
--to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.