All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
To: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] x86/vm86: Eliminate kernel_vm86_struct
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 07:46:06 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1437047167-5634-7-git-send-email-brgerst@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1437047167-5634-1-git-send-email-brgerst@gmail.com>

Now there is no vm86-specific data left on the kernel stack while in
userspace, except for the 32-bit regs.

Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/vm86.h | 25 +------------
 arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c   | 91 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/vm86.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/vm86.h
index 8e83e57..6573145 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/vm86.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/vm86.h
@@ -28,32 +28,9 @@ struct kernel_vm86_regs {
 	unsigned short gs, __gsh;
 };
 
-struct kernel_vm86_struct {
-	struct kernel_vm86_regs regs;
-/*
- * the below part remains on the kernel stack while we are in VM86 mode.
- * 'tss.esp0' then contains the address of VM86_TSS_ESP0 below, and when we
- * get forced back from VM86, the CPU and "SAVE_ALL" will restore the above
- * 'struct kernel_vm86_regs' with the then actual values.
- * Therefore, pt_regs in fact points to a complete 'kernel_vm86_struct'
- * in kernelspace, hence we need not reget the data from userspace.
- */
-#define VM86_TSS_ESP0 regs32
-	struct pt_regs *regs32;   /* here we save the pointer to the old regs */
-/*
- * The below is not part of the structure, but the stack layout continues
- * this way. In front of 'return-eip' may be some data, depending on
- * compilation, so we don't rely on this and save the pointer to 'oldregs'
- * in 'regs32' above.
- * However, with GCC-2.7.2 and the current CFLAGS you see exactly this:
-
-	long return-eip;        from call to vm86()
-	struct pt_regs oldregs;  user space registers as saved by syscall
- */
-};
-
 struct kernel_vm86_info {
 	struct vm86plus_struct __user *vm86_info;
+	struct pt_regs *regs32;
 	unsigned long v86flags;
 	unsigned long v86mask;
 	unsigned long saved_sp0;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c
index 29a9d92..0f807be 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c
@@ -67,9 +67,6 @@
  */
 
 
-#define KVM86	((struct kernel_vm86_struct *)regs)
-
-
 /*
  * 8- and 16-bit register defines..
  */
@@ -144,7 +141,7 @@ struct pt_regs *save_v86_state(struct kernel_vm86_regs *regs)
 	vm86->saved_sp0 = 0;
 	put_cpu();
 
-	ret = KVM86->regs32;
+	ret = vm86->regs32;
 
 	lazy_load_gs(vm86->saved_gs);
 
@@ -186,29 +183,16 @@ out:
 
 
 static int do_vm86_irq_handling(int subfunction, int irqnumber);
-static long do_sys_vm86(struct vm86plus_struct __user *v86, bool plus,
-			struct kernel_vm86_struct *info);
+static long do_sys_vm86(struct vm86plus_struct __user *v86, bool plus);
 
 SYSCALL_DEFINE1(vm86old, struct vm86_struct __user *, v86)
 {
-	struct kernel_vm86_struct info; /* declare this _on top_,
-					 * this avoids wasting of stack space.
-					 * This remains on the stack until we
-					 * return to 32 bit user space.
-					 */
-
-	return do_sys_vm86((struct vm86plus_struct __user *) v86, false, &info);
+	return do_sys_vm86((struct vm86plus_struct __user *) v86, false);
 }
 
 
 SYSCALL_DEFINE2(vm86, unsigned long, cmd, unsigned long, arg)
 {
-	struct kernel_vm86_struct info; /* declare this _on top_,
-					 * this avoids wasting of stack space.
-					 * This remains on the stack until we
-					 * return to 32 bit user space.
-					 */
-
 	switch (cmd) {
 	case VM86_REQUEST_IRQ:
 	case VM86_FREE_IRQ:
@@ -226,16 +210,17 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(vm86, unsigned long, cmd, unsigned long, arg)
 	}
 
 	/* we come here only for functions VM86_ENTER, VM86_ENTER_NO_BYPASS */
-	return do_sys_vm86((struct vm86plus_struct __user *) arg, true, &info);
+	return do_sys_vm86((struct vm86plus_struct __user *) arg, true);
 }
 
 
-static long do_sys_vm86(struct vm86plus_struct __user *v86, bool plus,
-			struct kernel_vm86_struct *info)
+static long do_sys_vm86(struct vm86plus_struct __user *v86, bool plus)
 {
 	struct tss_struct *tss;
 	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
 	struct kernel_vm86_info *vm86 = tsk->thread.vm86;
+	struct kernel_vm86_regs vm86regs;
+	struct pt_regs *regs32 = current_pt_regs();
 	unsigned long err = 0;
 
 	if (!vm86)
@@ -247,27 +232,27 @@ static long do_sys_vm86(struct vm86plus_struct __user *v86, bool plus,
 	if (vm86->saved_sp0)
 		return -EPERM;
 
-	memset(info, 0, sizeof(*info));
+	memset(&vm86regs, 0, sizeof(vm86regs));
 	get_user_try {
 		unsigned short seg;
-		get_user_ex(info->regs.pt.bx, &v86->regs.ebx);
-		get_user_ex(info->regs.pt.cx, &v86->regs.ecx);
-		get_user_ex(info->regs.pt.dx, &v86->regs.edx);
-		get_user_ex(info->regs.pt.si, &v86->regs.esi);
-		get_user_ex(info->regs.pt.di, &v86->regs.edi);
-		get_user_ex(info->regs.pt.bp, &v86->regs.ebp);
-		get_user_ex(info->regs.pt.ax, &v86->regs.eax);
-		get_user_ex(info->regs.pt.ip, &v86->regs.eip);
+		get_user_ex(vm86regs.pt.bx, &v86->regs.ebx);
+		get_user_ex(vm86regs.pt.cx, &v86->regs.ecx);
+		get_user_ex(vm86regs.pt.dx, &v86->regs.edx);
+		get_user_ex(vm86regs.pt.si, &v86->regs.esi);
+		get_user_ex(vm86regs.pt.di, &v86->regs.edi);
+		get_user_ex(vm86regs.pt.bp, &v86->regs.ebp);
+		get_user_ex(vm86regs.pt.ax, &v86->regs.eax);
+		get_user_ex(vm86regs.pt.ip, &v86->regs.eip);
 		get_user_ex(seg, &v86->regs.cs);
-		info->regs.pt.cs = seg;
-		get_user_ex(info->regs.pt.flags, &v86->regs.eflags);
-		get_user_ex(info->regs.pt.sp, &v86->regs.esp);
+		vm86regs.pt.cs = seg;
+		get_user_ex(vm86regs.pt.flags, &v86->regs.eflags);
+		get_user_ex(vm86regs.pt.sp, &v86->regs.esp);
 		get_user_ex(seg, &v86->regs.ss);
-		info->regs.pt.ss = seg;
-		get_user_ex(info->regs.es, &v86->regs.es);
-		get_user_ex(info->regs.ds, &v86->regs.ds);
-		get_user_ex(info->regs.fs, &v86->regs.fs);
-		get_user_ex(info->regs.gs, &v86->regs.gs);
+		vm86regs.pt.ss = seg;
+		get_user_ex(vm86regs.es, &v86->regs.es);
+		get_user_ex(vm86regs.ds, &v86->regs.ds);
+		get_user_ex(vm86regs.fs, &v86->regs.fs);
+		get_user_ex(vm86regs.gs, &v86->regs.gs);
 
 		get_user_ex(vm86->flags, &v86->flags);
 		get_user_ex(vm86->screen_bitmap, &v86->screen_bitmap);
@@ -290,8 +275,7 @@ static long do_sys_vm86(struct vm86plus_struct __user *v86, bool plus,
 	} else
 		memset(&vm86->vm86plus, 0,
 		       sizeof(struct vm86plus_info_struct));
-
-	info->regs32 = current_pt_regs();
+	vm86->regs32 = regs32;
 	vm86->vm86_info = v86;
 
 /*
@@ -299,12 +283,12 @@ static long do_sys_vm86(struct vm86plus_struct __user *v86, bool plus,
  * has set it up safely, so this makes sure interrupt etc flags are
  * inherited from protected mode.
  */
-	VEFLAGS = info->regs.pt.flags;
-	info->regs.pt.flags &= SAFE_MASK;
-	info->regs.pt.flags |= info->regs32->flags & ~SAFE_MASK;
-	info->regs.pt.flags |= X86_VM_MASK;
+	VEFLAGS = vm86regs.pt.flags;
+	vm86regs.pt.flags &= SAFE_MASK;
+	vm86regs.pt.flags |= regs32->flags & ~SAFE_MASK;
+	vm86regs.pt.flags |= X86_VM_MASK;
 
-	info->regs.pt.orig_ax = info->regs32->orig_ax;
+	vm86regs.pt.orig_ax = regs32->orig_ax;
 
 	switch (vm86->cpu_type) {
 	case CPU_286:
@@ -324,12 +308,13 @@ static long do_sys_vm86(struct vm86plus_struct __user *v86, bool plus,
 /*
  * Save old state, set default return value (%ax) to 0 (VM86_SIGNAL)
  */
-	info->regs32->ax = VM86_SIGNAL;
+	regs32->ax = VM86_SIGNAL;
 	vm86->saved_sp0 = tsk->thread.sp0;
 	lazy_save_gs(vm86->saved_gs);
 
 	tss = &per_cpu(cpu_tss, get_cpu());
-	tsk->thread.sp0 = (unsigned long) &info->VM86_TSS_ESP0;
+	/* Set new sp0 right below 32-bit regs */
+	tsk->thread.sp0 = (unsigned long) regs32;
 	if (cpu_has_sep)
 		tsk->thread.sysenter_cs = 0;
 	load_sp0(tss, &tsk->thread);
@@ -352,7 +337,7 @@ static long do_sys_vm86(struct vm86plus_struct __user *v86, bool plus,
 #endif
 		"jmp resume_userspace"
 		: /* no outputs */
-		:"r" (&info->regs), "r" (task_thread_info(tsk)), "r" (0));
+		:"r" (&vm86regs), "r" (task_thread_info(tsk)), "r" (0));
 	unreachable();	/* we never return here */
 }
 
@@ -557,12 +542,14 @@ cannot_handle:
 
 int handle_vm86_trap(struct kernel_vm86_regs *regs, long error_code, int trapno)
 {
-	if (current->thread.vm86->vm86plus.is_vm86pus) {
+	struct kernel_vm86_info *vm86 = current->thread.vm86;
+
+	if (vm86->vm86plus.is_vm86pus) {
 		if ((trapno == 3) || (trapno == 1)) {
-			KVM86->regs32->ax = VM86_TRAP + (trapno << 8);
+			vm86->regs32->ax = VM86_TRAP + (trapno << 8);
 			/* setting this flag forces the code in entry_32.S to
 			   the path where we call save_v86_state() and change
-			   the stack pointer to KVM86->regs32 */
+			   the stack pointer to regs32 */
 			set_thread_flag(TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME);
 			return 0;
 		}
-- 
2.4.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-07-16 11:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-16 11:46 [PATCH v2] x86: vm86 cleanups Brian Gerst
2015-07-16 11:46 ` [PATCH 1/7] x86/vm86: Clean up saved_fs/gs Brian Gerst
2015-07-16 15:45   ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-16 15:57     ` Brian Gerst
2015-07-16 11:46 ` [PATCH 2/7] x86/vm86: Preserve orig_ax Brian Gerst
2015-07-16 15:57   ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-16 11:46 ` [PATCH 3/7] x86/vm86: Move userspace accesses to do_sys_vm86() Brian Gerst
2015-07-16 15:42   ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-16 16:02     ` Brian Gerst
2015-07-16 11:46 ` [PATCH 4/7] x86/vm86: Move vm86 fields out of thread_struct Brian Gerst
2015-07-17 19:01   ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-16 11:46 ` [PATCH 5/7] x86/vm86: Move fields from kernel_vm86_struct Brian Gerst
2015-07-17 19:02   ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-16 11:46 ` Brian Gerst [this message]
2015-07-17 19:05   ` [PATCH 6/7] x86/vm86: Eliminate kernel_vm86_struct Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-16 11:46 ` [PATCH 7/7] x86/vm86: Use the normal pt_regs area for vm86 Brian Gerst
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-07-20  1:09 [PATCH v3] x86: vm86 cleanups Brian Gerst
2015-07-20  1:09 ` [PATCH 6/7] x86/vm86: Eliminate kernel_vm86_struct Brian Gerst

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1437047167-5634-7-git-send-email-brgerst@gmail.com \
    --to=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.