From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: bart.vanassche@sandisk.com, JBottomley@Odin.com,
dledford@redhat.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
sagig@mellanox.com, sebastian.riemer@profitbricks.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "scsi_transport_srp: Introduce srp_wait_for_queuecommand()" has been added to the 3.14-stable tree
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 20:13:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1437102803238112@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
scsi_transport_srp: Introduce srp_wait_for_queuecommand()
to the 3.14-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
scsi_transport_srp-introduce-srp_wait_for_queuecommand.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.14 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From be34c62ddf39d1931780b07a6f4241393e4ba2ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 13:22:19 +0200
Subject: scsi_transport_srp: Introduce srp_wait_for_queuecommand()
From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
commit be34c62ddf39d1931780b07a6f4241393e4ba2ee upstream.
Introduce the helper function srp_wait_for_queuecommand().
Move the definition of scsi_request_fn_active(). Add a comment
above srp_wait_for_queuecommand() that support for scsi-mq needs
to be added.
This patch does not change any functionality. A second call to
srp_wait_for_queuecommand() will be introduced in the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Odin.com>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com>
Cc: Sebastian Parschauer <sebastian.riemer@profitbricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.c
@@ -397,6 +397,36 @@ static void srp_reconnect_work(struct wo
}
}
+/**
+ * scsi_request_fn_active() - number of kernel threads inside scsi_request_fn()
+ * @shost: SCSI host for which to count the number of scsi_request_fn() callers.
+ *
+ * To do: add support for scsi-mq in this function.
+ */
+static int scsi_request_fn_active(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
+{
+ struct scsi_device *sdev;
+ struct request_queue *q;
+ int request_fn_active = 0;
+
+ shost_for_each_device(sdev, shost) {
+ q = sdev->request_queue;
+
+ spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
+ request_fn_active += q->request_fn_active;
+ spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
+ }
+
+ return request_fn_active;
+}
+
+/* Wait until ongoing shost->hostt->queuecommand() calls have finished. */
+static void srp_wait_for_queuecommand(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
+{
+ while (scsi_request_fn_active(shost))
+ msleep(20);
+}
+
static void __rport_fail_io_fast(struct srp_rport *rport)
{
struct Scsi_Host *shost = rport_to_shost(rport);
@@ -505,27 +535,6 @@ void srp_start_tl_fail_timers(struct srp
EXPORT_SYMBOL(srp_start_tl_fail_timers);
/**
- * scsi_request_fn_active() - number of kernel threads inside scsi_request_fn()
- * @shost: SCSI host for which to count the number of scsi_request_fn() callers.
- */
-static int scsi_request_fn_active(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
-{
- struct scsi_device *sdev;
- struct request_queue *q;
- int request_fn_active = 0;
-
- shost_for_each_device(sdev, shost) {
- q = sdev->request_queue;
-
- spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
- request_fn_active += q->request_fn_active;
- spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
- }
-
- return request_fn_active;
-}
-
-/**
* srp_reconnect_rport() - reconnect to an SRP target port
* @rport: SRP target port.
*
@@ -560,8 +569,7 @@ int srp_reconnect_rport(struct srp_rport
if (res)
goto out;
scsi_target_block(&shost->shost_gendev);
- while (scsi_request_fn_active(shost))
- msleep(20);
+ srp_wait_for_queuecommand(shost);
res = rport->state != SRP_RPORT_LOST ? i->f->reconnect(rport) : -ENODEV;
pr_debug("%s (state %d): transport.reconnect() returned %d\n",
dev_name(&shost->shost_gendev), rport->state, res);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from bart.vanassche@sandisk.com are
queue-3.14/scsi_transport_srp-introduce-srp_wait_for_queuecommand.patch
queue-3.14/scsi_transport_srp-fix-a-race-condition.patch
reply other threads:[~2015-07-17 3:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1437102803238112@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=JBottomley@Odin.com \
--cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=sagig@mellanox.com \
--cc=sebastian.riemer@profitbricks.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.