From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753229AbbGSMTo (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sun, 19 Jul 2015 08:19:44 -0400
Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com ([209.85.212.181]:38457 "EHLO
	mail-wi0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752303AbbGSMTn (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 19 Jul 2015 08:19:43 -0400
Message-ID: <1437308375.3520.114.camel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] workqueue: avoiding unbounded wq on isolated CPUs by
 default
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
        "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lclaudio@uudg.org>
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 14:19:35 +0200
In-Reply-To: <1437292973.3505.83.camel@gmail.com>
References: <9e53de7c91c885ee255e16ee25f401d9eedf08d9.1437067317.git.bristot@redhat.com>
	 <20150716192448.GY15934@mtj.duckdns.org>
	 <1437107190.3438.23.camel@gmail.com>
	 <20150717152720.GD15934@mtj.duckdns.org>
	 <1437153348.5860.32.camel@gmail.com> <20150718133602.GA3041@lerouge>
	 <1437292973.3505.83.camel@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.11 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, 2015-07-19 at 10:02 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:

> Why do we do nothing about these allegedly unbound work items?

Hm, the answer to that question may be as simple as "Because we know
gotchas exist, but not where they all the little bastards live" ;-)

	-Mike