From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755108AbbGTDmr (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sun, 19 Jul 2015 23:42:47 -0400
Received: from mail-wg0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]:34716 "EHLO
	mail-wg0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754256AbbGTDmp (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 19 Jul 2015 23:42:45 -0400
Message-ID: <1437363758.3489.58.camel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sched: modify how to compute a slice and check a
 preemptability
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 05:42:38 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20150720003405.GG3956@byungchulpark-X58A-UD3R>
References: <1437297060-25378-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com>
	 <1437307034.3520.108.camel@gmail.com>
	 <20150720003405.GG3956@byungchulpark-X58A-UD3R>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.11 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 09:34 +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:

> yes, i also think that a preemption granularity has little meaning, atually 
> because of tick granularity.

See HR_TICK.  It's not cheap though, why it's default off.

	-Mike