From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
To: osstest service owner <osstest-admin@xenproject.org>,
Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: [xen-unstable test] 59721: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 09:48:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1437382097.32450.1.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <osstest-59721-mainreport@xen.org>
On Sun, 2015-07-19 at 10:19 +0000, osstest service owner wrote:
> flight 59721 xen-unstable real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/59721/
>
> Regressions :-(
>
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 9 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 58965
I think we have considered discounting i386 qemu-dm as a thing we care
about, in which case we could force push this change since this was the
only fail..
>
> Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
> test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 3 host-install(3) broken pass in 59699
> test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd 3 host-install(3) broken pass in 59699
> test-amd64-i386-rumpuserxen-i386 3 host-install(3) broken pass in 59699
> test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel 3 host-install(3) broken pass in 59699
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 3 host-install(3) broken pass in 59699
> test-amd64-i386-xl 3 host-install(3) broken pass in 59699
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 3 host-install(3) broken pass in 59699
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 3 host-install(3) broken pass in 59699
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3-vcpus1 3 host-install(3) broken pass in 59699
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 3 host-install(3) broken pass in 59699
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 3 host-install(3) broken pass in 59699
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 3 host-install(3) broken pass in 59699
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 3 host-install(3) broken pass in 59699
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 14 guest-start.2 fail in 59699 pass in 59721
> test-amd64-amd64-xl 9 debian-install fail pass in 59699
Some of these host-install fails are a bit worrying, but not a blocker
to a forced push IMHO.
> version targeted for testing:
> xen 21d9b079e53805b68047d60d28cde224d09bbb40
> baseline version:
> xen c40317f11b3f05e7c06a2213560c8471081f2662
>
> Last test of basis 58965 2015-06-29 02:08:30 Z 20 days
> Failing since 58974 2015-06-29 15:11:59 Z 19 days 25 attempts
> Testing same since 59681 2015-07-18 00:10:50 Z 1 days 3 attempts
Ian.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-20 8:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-19 10:19 [xen-unstable test] 59721: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass osstest service owner
2015-07-20 8:48 ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2015-07-20 8:59 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-20 12:22 ` Ian Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1437382097.32450.1.camel@citrix.com \
--to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=osstest-admin@xenproject.org \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.