From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: ming.lei@canonical.com, axboe@fb.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
jforbes@fedoraproject.org, tj@kernel.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "block: loop: convert to per-device workqueue" has been added to the 4.1-stable tree
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 12:12:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <143828353433128@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
block: loop: convert to per-device workqueue
to the 4.1-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
block-loop-convert-to-per-device-workqueue.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.1 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From f4aa4c7bbac6c4afdd4adccf90898c1a3685396d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 19:49:54 +0800
Subject: block: loop: convert to per-device workqueue
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
commit f4aa4c7bbac6c4afdd4adccf90898c1a3685396d upstream.
Documentation/workqueue.txt:
If there is dependency among multiple work items used
during memory reclaim, they should be queued to separate
wq each with WQ_MEM_RECLAIM.
Loop devices can be stacked, so we have to convert to per-device
workqueue. One example is Fedora live CD.
Fixes: b5dd2f6047ca108001328aac0e8588edd15f1778
Cc: Justin M. Forbes <jforbes@fedoraproject.org>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/block/loop.c | 30 ++++++++++++++----------------
drivers/block/loop.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -86,8 +86,6 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(loop_index_mutex);
static int max_part;
static int part_shift;
-static struct workqueue_struct *loop_wq;
-
static int transfer_xor(struct loop_device *lo, int cmd,
struct page *raw_page, unsigned raw_off,
struct page *loop_page, unsigned loop_off,
@@ -725,6 +723,12 @@ static int loop_set_fd(struct loop_devic
size = get_loop_size(lo, file);
if ((loff_t)(sector_t)size != size)
goto out_putf;
+ error = -ENOMEM;
+ lo->wq = alloc_workqueue("kloopd%d",
+ WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_HIGHPRI | WQ_UNBOUND, 0,
+ lo->lo_number);
+ if (!lo->wq)
+ goto out_putf;
error = 0;
@@ -872,6 +876,8 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_devic
lo->lo_flags = 0;
if (!part_shift)
lo->lo_disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN;
+ destroy_workqueue(lo->wq);
+ lo->wq = NULL;
mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
/*
* Need not hold lo_ctl_mutex to fput backing file.
@@ -1425,9 +1431,13 @@ static int loop_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_h
const struct blk_mq_queue_data *bd)
{
struct loop_cmd *cmd = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(bd->rq);
+ struct loop_device *lo = cmd->rq->q->queuedata;
blk_mq_start_request(bd->rq);
+ if (lo->lo_state != Lo_bound)
+ return -EIO;
+
if (cmd->rq->cmd_flags & REQ_WRITE) {
struct loop_device *lo = cmd->rq->q->queuedata;
bool need_sched = true;
@@ -1441,9 +1451,9 @@ static int loop_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_h
spin_unlock_irq(&lo->lo_lock);
if (need_sched)
- queue_work(loop_wq, &lo->write_work);
+ queue_work(lo->wq, &lo->write_work);
} else {
- queue_work(loop_wq, &cmd->read_work);
+ queue_work(lo->wq, &cmd->read_work);
}
return BLK_MQ_RQ_QUEUE_OK;
@@ -1455,9 +1465,6 @@ static void loop_handle_cmd(struct loop_
struct loop_device *lo = cmd->rq->q->queuedata;
int ret = -EIO;
- if (lo->lo_state != Lo_bound)
- goto failed;
-
if (write && (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_READ_ONLY))
goto failed;
@@ -1806,13 +1813,6 @@ static int __init loop_init(void)
goto misc_out;
}
- loop_wq = alloc_workqueue("kloopd",
- WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_HIGHPRI | WQ_UNBOUND, 0);
- if (!loop_wq) {
- err = -ENOMEM;
- goto misc_out;
- }
-
blk_register_region(MKDEV(LOOP_MAJOR, 0), range,
THIS_MODULE, loop_probe, NULL, NULL);
@@ -1850,8 +1850,6 @@ static void __exit loop_exit(void)
blk_unregister_region(MKDEV(LOOP_MAJOR, 0), range);
unregister_blkdev(LOOP_MAJOR, "loop");
- destroy_workqueue(loop_wq);
-
misc_deregister(&loop_misc);
}
--- a/drivers/block/loop.h
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.h
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ struct loop_device {
gfp_t old_gfp_mask;
spinlock_t lo_lock;
+ struct workqueue_struct *wq;
struct list_head write_cmd_head;
struct work_struct write_work;
bool write_started;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from ming.lei@canonical.com are
queue-4.1/block-loop-avoiding-too-many-pending-per-work-i-o.patch
queue-4.1/block-loop-convert-to-per-device-workqueue.patch
reply other threads:[~2015-07-30 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=143828353433128@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=jforbes@fedoraproject.org \
--cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.