All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: <b29983@freescale.com>
Cc: <b07421@freescale.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tang Yuantian <Yuantian.Tang@freescale.com>,
	Chenhui Zhao <chenhui.zhao@freescale.com>,
	Tang Yuantian <Yuantian.Tang@feescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] PowerPC/mpc85xx: Add hotplug support on E5500 and E500MC cores
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 19:14:42 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1438388082.19345.85.camel@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1438334444-31919-2-git-send-email-b29983@freescale.com>

On Fri, 2015-07-31 at 17:20 +0800, b29983@freescale.com wrote:
> From: Tang Yuantian <Yuantian.Tang@freescale.com>
> 
> Freescale E500MC and E5500 core-based platforms, like P4080, T1040,
> support disabling/enabling CPU dynamically.
> This patch adds this feature on those platforms.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chenhui Zhao <chenhui.zhao@freescale.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tang Yuantian <Yuantian.Tang@feescale.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/Kconfig              |  2 +-
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h    |  1 +
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c         |  5 +++++
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/smp.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> ---
>  4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> index 5ef2711..dd9e252 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> @@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ config SWIOTLB
>  config HOTPLUG_CPU
>       bool "Support for enabling/disabling CPUs"
>       depends on SMP && (PPC_PSERIES || \
> -     PPC_PMAC || PPC_POWERNV || (PPC_85xx && !PPC_E500MC))
> +     PPC_PMAC || PPC_POWERNV || FSL_SOC_BOOKE)
>       ---help---
>         Say Y here to be able to disable and re-enable individual
>         CPUs at runtime on SMP machines.



> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h
> index 825663c..bf37d17 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h
> @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ void generic_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu);
>  void generic_set_cpu_dead(unsigned int cpu);
>  void generic_set_cpu_up(unsigned int cpu);
>  int generic_check_cpu_restart(unsigned int cpu);
> +int generic_check_cpu_dead(unsigned int cpu);
>  #endif
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> index ec9ec20..2cca27a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -454,6 +454,11 @@ int generic_check_cpu_restart(unsigned int cpu)
>       return per_cpu(cpu_state, cpu) == CPU_UP_PREPARE;
>  }
>  
> +int generic_check_cpu_dead(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> +     return per_cpu(cpu_state, cpu) == CPU_DEAD;
> +}

Is there a non-generic check_cpu_dead()?

It gets open-coded in generic_cpu_die()... Either open-code it elsewhere, or 
call it check_cpu_dead() and use it everywhere there's a CPU_DEAD check.


> +
>  static bool secondaries_inhibited(void)
>  {
>       return kvm_hv_mode_active();
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/smp.c 
> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/smp.c
> index 6811a5b..7f0dadb 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/smp.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ struct epapr_spin_table {
>       u32     pir;
>  };
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
>  static u64 timebase;
>  static int tb_req;
>  static int tb_valid;
> @@ -111,7 +112,7 @@ static void mpc85xx_take_timebase(void)
>       local_irq_restore(flags);
>  }
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> +#ifndef CONFIG_PPC_E500MC
>  static void e500_cpu_idle(void)

What happens if we bisect to patch 1/3 and run this on e500mc?

Please move the ifdef to that patch.

>  {
>       u32 tmp;
> @@ -127,6 +128,7 @@ static void e500_cpu_idle(void)
>       mtmsr(tmp);
>       isync();
>  }
> +#endif
>  
>  static void qoriq_cpu_dying(void)
>  {
> @@ -144,11 +146,30 @@ static void qoriq_cpu_dying(void)
>  
>       generic_set_cpu_dead(cpu);
>  
> +#ifndef CONFIG_PPC_E500MC
>       e500_cpu_idle();
> +#endif
>  
>       while (1)
>               ;
>  }
> +
> +static void qoriq_real_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu)

Real as opposed to...?

> +{
> +     int i;
> +
> +     for (i = 0; i < 50000; i++) {
> +             if (generic_check_cpu_dead(cpu)) {
> +                     qoriq_pm_ops->cpu_die(cpu);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> +                     paca[cpu].cpu_start = 0;
> +#endif
> +                     return;
> +             }
> +             udelay(10);
> +     }
> +     pr_err("%s: CPU%d didn't die...\n", __func__, cpu);
> +}

Only 500ms timeout, versus 10sec in generic_cpu_die()?

>  #endif
>  
>  static inline void flush_spin_table(void *spin_table)
> @@ -246,11 +267,7 @@ static int smp_85xx_kick_cpu(int nr)
>               spin_table = phys_to_virt(*cpu_rel_addr);
>  
>       local_irq_save(flags);
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PPC32
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> -     /* Corresponding to generic_set_cpu_dead() */
> -     generic_set_cpu_up(nr);
> -
>       if (system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING) {
>               /*
>                * To keep it compatible with old boot program which uses
> @@ -263,6 +280,7 @@ static int smp_85xx_kick_cpu(int nr)
>               out_be32(&spin_table->addr_l, 0);
>               flush_spin_table(spin_table);
>  
> +             qoriq_pm_ops->cpu_up(nr);

Again, is it possible to get here without a valid qoriq_pm_ops (i.e. is there 
anything stopping the user from trying to initiate CPU hotplug)?

-Scott


  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-01  0:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-31  9:20 [PATCH 1/3] Powerpc: mpc85xx: refactor the PM operations b29983
2015-07-31  9:20 ` [PATCH 2/3] PowerPC/mpc85xx: Add hotplug support on E5500 and E500MC cores b29983
2015-08-01  0:14   ` Scott Wood [this message]
2015-08-03 11:52     ` Chenhui Zhao
2015-08-03 21:18       ` Scott Wood
2015-08-05 10:39         ` Chenhui Zhao
2015-07-31  9:20 ` [PATCH 3/3] PowerPC/mpc85xx: Add hotplug support on E6500 cores b29983
2015-08-01  0:22   ` Scott Wood
2015-08-05 11:08     ` Chenhui Zhao
2015-08-06  3:16       ` Scott Wood
2015-08-06  4:32         ` Chenhui Zhao
2015-08-06  5:44           ` Scott Wood
2015-07-31 23:59 ` [PATCH 1/3] Powerpc: mpc85xx: refactor the PM operations Scott Wood
2015-08-03 11:32   ` Chenhui Zhao
2015-08-03 20:26     ` Scott Wood
2015-08-05 10:11       ` Chenhui Zhao
2015-08-06  2:57         ` Scott Wood
2015-08-06  4:20           ` Chenhui Zhao
2015-08-06  5:46             ` Scott Wood
2015-08-06  5:54               ` Chenhui Zhao
2015-08-06 18:02                 ` Scott Wood
2015-08-07  3:19                   ` Chenhui Zhao
2015-08-08  0:13                     ` Scott Wood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1438388082.19345.85.camel@freescale.com \
    --to=scottwood@freescale.com \
    --cc=Yuantian.Tang@feescale.com \
    --cc=Yuantian.Tang@freescale.com \
    --cc=b07421@freescale.com \
    --cc=b29983@freescale.com \
    --cc=chenhui.zhao@freescale.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.